xbox 360 review comparisson

The first review I read was the Microsoft xbox 360 review taken from: http://www.itreviews.co.uk/hardware/h852.htm.

This review was about the pros and cons of the xbox 360, the writer spoke about how much the xbox 360 costs, how much it storage space it has and additional pleasures such as using xbox live to download playable demos and trailers. The writer also gave the bad points about the xbox 360, the major point being how it had crashed four times within one hour of unpacking it. Also how the game titles that he/she played had let them down, and how the 20GB hard-drive would soon fill up if a die hard gamer woul;d be using it.

The second review I read was written by:
Paul Thurrott
November 8-22, 2005
Xbox 360 Review

This review was alot more bias, from the start you can see that the writer would not like you much if you said "actually I don't really like the xbox 360 because...". He practically worships the xbox 360 as a messiah of consols as he described it as a Holy Grail. He also includes alot of technical language like "A triple-core Power PC processor2 and "A CPU with three dedicated processing cores" which wouldn't mean much to alot of people. Unlike the first review he doesn't mention any of the bad points of the xbox which are quite obvious to anyone who owns an xobox 360 (which I do), it is a very well made machine and does provide you hours upon hours of fun but it's not a saviour as this writer persieves it to be.